View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0003447 | 10000-006: Mappings | Spec | public | 2016-06-07 21:11 | 2016-09-13 15:31 |
Reporter | Matthias Damm | Assigned To | randyarmstrong | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | 1.03 | ||||
Target Version | 1.03 | ||||
Summary | 0003447: Definition of min send and receive buffer size wrong | ||||
Description | Table 36 – OPC UA TCP Acknowledge Message Current definition: This value shall be greater than 8 192 bytes. I assume the intend was: If this assumption is right, we need an errata for OPC UA Part 6 V1.03. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Commit Version | |||||
Fix Due Date | |||||
|
While you're at it, there are two places in Part 6 that mention a minimum buffer or chunk size of 8196. Just search '8196' and you'll find them. |
|
I remember the BSI also raised a question if 8192 is the "correct" value here. |
|
See section 6.7.1 and 6.7.2. to make sure they are consistent with the fix (table 36). |
|
Does anybody know what the resolution to this will be? Will the specification change and an errata be issued, or will the current definition stand? |
|
BSI complained about two different numbers Table 35 – OPC UA TCP Hello Message Table 36 – OPC UA TCP Acknowledge Message 6.7 OPC UA Secure Conversation 6.7.2 MessageChunk structure The official answer was: Not sure where this statement is coming from. I would expect that both numbers should be the same. From a logical point of view, a min message size of 8KByte = 8192Byte makes sense. Therefore >= 8192 would be the logical definition. Several implementations use >= 8192. |
|
Remove the limits from the OPC UA TCP description. |
|
Reviewed and accepted changes edited in the meeting in DRAFT 1.04.02 and the 1.03 Errata. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2016-06-07 21:11 | Matthias Damm | New Issue | |
2016-06-07 21:12 | Matthias Damm | Description Updated | |
2016-06-08 21:48 | kevin | Note Added: 0007008 | |
2016-06-11 17:18 | Bernd Edlinger | Note Added: 0007011 | |
2016-06-14 15:11 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0007014 | |
2016-06-14 15:12 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => randyarmstrong |
2016-06-14 15:12 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
2016-06-15 18:16 | kevin | Note Added: 0007015 | |
2016-06-15 18:26 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0007016 | |
2016-06-16 15:44 | randyarmstrong | Note Added: 0007017 | |
2016-06-16 15:44 | randyarmstrong | Status | assigned => resolved |
2016-06-16 15:44 | randyarmstrong | Fixed in Version | => 1.03 |
2016-06-16 15:44 | randyarmstrong | Resolution | open => fixed |
2016-06-21 15:25 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0007030 | |
2016-06-21 15:25 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
2016-06-21 15:25 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | 1.03 => 1.04 |
2016-09-13 15:31 | Jim Luth | Relationship added | has duplicate 0003530 |