View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0003185 | 10000-012: Discovery | Spec | public | 2015-10-08 09:11 | 2017-05-02 16:35 |
Reporter | Matthias Damm | Assigned To | randyarmstrong | ||
Priority | high | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | 1.03 | ||||
Summary | 0003185: We are not precise enough about the visibility of objects that have security related access restrictions | ||||
Description | At the moment we just say what information is not shown or what method cannot be called if the user does not have the necessary rights and the channel is not encrypted. But we are silent on visibility of nodes e.g for ServerConfiguration objects. I have seen already several different variations.
I think we need at least the visibility of the ServerObject to indicate that the feature is supported but the user has no rights. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Commit Version | |||||
Fix Due Date | |||||
|
Added suggested restriction to the ServerConfiguration Object. Updated 1.04 DRAFT 03. |
|
Agreed to changes edited in telecon. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2015-10-08 09:11 | Matthias Damm | New Issue | |
2016-03-01 17:50 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => randyarmstrong |
2016-03-01 17:50 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
2016-03-01 17:50 | Jim Luth | Target Version | => 1.04 |
2016-12-05 20:02 | randyarmstrong | Note Added: 0007425 | |
2016-12-05 20:02 | randyarmstrong | Status | assigned => resolved |
2016-12-05 20:02 | randyarmstrong | Resolution | open => fixed |
2017-05-02 16:35 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0008022 | |
2017-05-02 16:35 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
2017-05-02 16:35 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | => 1.04 |